Where an inventory catalogs what exists, a content audit assesses it. A quantitative audit counts, how many pages, how many belong to each topic or content type, how many use a given template, and is useful mainly for scoping a project and estimating its cost. A qualitative audit rates the actual quality of content: how well it fits its target audience, how current and accurate it is, how credible it feels, and how well it serves both user and business goals, typically on a five-point scale for each dimension.
Quantitative audits are quick. Qualitative audits require real human judgment about every piece of content you review, which makes them far more labor-intensive, so the scope of a qualitative audit has to be chosen deliberately, focusing effort where it will matter most rather than attempting to rate everything equally.
Counting your content tells you how big the job is. Judging your content tells you which parts of the job are actually worth doing.
Targeting the qualitative audit to campaign-critical sections, with a lighter quantitative pass elsewhere, is the realistic approach. A qualitative audit requires real human judgment on every page reviewed, which the source material is explicit makes it far more labor-intensive than counting. With one person and two weeks, applying that judgment evenly across 400 pages regardless of strategic importance would mean spending scarce time on peripheral content at the expense of the sections that actually matter to the campaign's success.
A quantitative-only audit across the whole site would be fast, but it would tell the team only how much content exists in each section, not whether that content is actually any good, current, or persuasive enough to support a fundraising push. For a campaign specifically, quantity without quality judgment leaves the most important question, is this content actually going to convince someone to donate, completely unanswered.For the campaign-critical sections, the dimensions that matter most are likely business goals and business value, does the content actually drive the specific action the campaign needs, namely donations, alongside currency, since outdated statistics or past campaign details on a donation page actively undermine credibility with a prospective donor deciding whether to trust the organization with their money right now.
Fill in your own details below; the prompt updates as you type. When it's ready, copy it into Claude or whatever AI tool you use.
Casts the AI as: You're a content strategist experienced in content audits and inventory management.
Spells out exactly what to analyze and return.
Organization, Trigger, Known issues and Constraints tell the AI what your specific situation is, not a generic one.
Complete audit methodology with templates
Fill in your own details below; the prompt updates as you type. When it's ready, copy it into Claude or whatever AI tool you use.
Design phased audit approaches for complex content audits, breaking analysis into focused passes that build on each other: structure → category-level → cross-category relationships.
Fill in your own details below; the prompt updates as you type. When it's ready, copy it into Claude or whatever AI tool you use.
Casts the AI as a content quality analyst with expertise in the domain you enter in the Domain field (for example, API or developer documentation standards).
Names 5 specific outputs to produce, so the response comes back structured rather than a general summary.
Content type, Target audience, Last updated and Traffic/importance tell the AI what your specific situation is, not a generic one.
Structured assessment with actionable findings
Fill in your own details below; the prompt updates as you type. When it's ready, copy it into Claude or whatever AI tool you use.
Use this prompt when: Starting a new content audit project.